As the population is increasing, cities are becoming bigger, towns are becoming into dense, that drastically increase the production of garbage and sewage so that many mega cities such as Mumbai, Delhi, Shanghai are currently coping with measures for management of the waste produced. The prompts mentions that limiting waste acceptance from each hold is best method for solving management of waste that solve environmental problem related to it. The policy may have some positive effect, however, it lacks various factors, making the policy not the best method for mitigation of environmental debasement.
The problem arises with the size of the family since some house may have joint family while other nuclear. Also, some houses may have higher number of tenants than other. The city policy, regarding the waste, may be one the average waste they receive. So the people living in the house with many people might have a problem with policy. They might be compelled to pile the dross in their houses which can deteriorate their health or use the river or any open ground to dispose the waste which can degrade the environment. The policy should hold on accepting the garbage amount depending upon the number of people in each house. Furthermore, it also encourage many person to have in hotel and use laundry facility in order to decrease the waste from the house, but increase waste produced by hotel or laundry. As a result, there total waste produced may be same or little different from city, prior to announcement of the policy.
If people living on area where such policy is proclaimed are uneducated, such policy has minimum advantage or may be counter effect. In a small town of Nepal Birgunj, where people are mostly uneducated , municipality, due to lack of dumping site, announced to uptake limited amount of garbage from house, but it didn’t lead to reduction of the waste, instead they laid the dross in streets or open surrounding, making the surrounding polluted. Moreover, the waste produced should have reduced if the participation is higher in the prevention of deterioration of environment due to production of waste. Participated and concerned people would take their own bags while going to store, ponder about how to recycle the home product, and make use of durable good rather than single-time used goods such as disposable napkins and mask.
However, such policy can be one of the characteristics, which can lead to garbage reduction from one house. The people have to think twice while they are doing things that can produce garbage such as cooking, partying, washing, but it is not the best method for reduction of the dross from the houses. It can lead to various problem discussed in previous paragraph. The best method involve multiple factors-engaging people participation, compelling industries to produce less dross like toothpaste without outer cover, made of thin covering -which should be taken into account comprehensively.
In conclusion, as the only limiting the dross product accepted from houses can lead to many problems, causing further aggravation of environment. Therefore, the policy inscribed in the prompt is not the best method for alleviation of environment pollution.
- #7 How do movies or television influence people's behavior? use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 62
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. 58
- Some people say that teaching local history to school children is more important than teaching world history to them. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'mention'.
Suggestion: mention
...ent of the waste produced. The prompts mentions that limiting waste acceptance from eac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...imiting waste acceptance from each hold is best method for solving management of waste ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f waste that solve environmental problem related to it. The policy may have some ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...igation of environmental debasement. The problem arises with the size of the fam...
^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encourages'?
Suggestion: encourages
...le in each house. Furthermore, it also encourage many person to have in hotel and use la...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun person seems to be countable; consider using: 'many people', 'many persons'.
Suggestion: many people; many persons
... house. Furthermore, it also encourage many person to have in hotel and use laundry facili...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se, but increase waste produced by hotel or laundry. As a result, there total was...
^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gunj, where people are mostly uneducated , municipality, due to lack of dumping si...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2716.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1931166348 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77818289816 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485659655832 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 866.7 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0455559748 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9047619048 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20115532369 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658010144394 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587601001418 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125363084349 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053057633499 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.