some people believe maintaining your friends for a long period of time will make you more happy, others believe making a lot of friends is more important
Making new friends and establishing new relationships is an essential part of every day life. Every body has at least one friend during their life time. Friends have a significant role in our overall happiness. As a result, people question what kind of friendship is more important for achieving the goal of being happy and cheerful. Some believe having a long term relation with few friends is a way to become happy while others feel making a lot of friends is more important. Personally, I think happiness in a friendship should be evaluated by numbers of friends one van keep during their life span. I have two reasons.
First, by considering people who have been with their pals for a long time, we can understand that they have a good behavior and common sense. In fact, human beings have various attributes. Those who can get along with different types of people and also they respect other's beliefs have the most powerful and best characteristic. What I mean is, by having this characteristic, these people tend to be more happy because they understand other's feelings and they have positive regard toward others. This behavior makes these people feel joyful inside.
Second, those who think happiness is measured by the number of friends one have and state that the more the number of friends the more delighted the person is, do not pay enough attention to the quality of the friendship. In addition, they neglect the fact that relationships need time and a lot of effort to posses a good quality. However, there are a number of people who just make friends so that these friends could open many doors for them such as finding a job. As a result, this kind of friendship is not going to last for a long time because if the friend is not beneficial for that person anymore, the relationship will end.
In conclusion, maintaining friends for a long time provides not only a qualified relation for both sides, but also is a major factor that contributes in one's overall happiness. People who are aware of the value of friendships and consider their friends worth-full, respect them and make a lot of effort to keep that friendship. Therefore, these people posses a delightful characteristic.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- humpback whales 73
- Agnostids 70
- coins in North America 66
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...dy has at least one friend during their life time. Friends have a significant role in our...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g their life span. I have two reasons. First, by considering people who have be...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, at least, i mean, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83862433862 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72209367193 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494708994709 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3715153807 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2631578947 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366511648503 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110664159102 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854846169751 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236907989647 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787758696621 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.