Some people believe it is a good idea to use cameras to watch and record people’s activities in public since it can increase safety; others think it has too many negative consequences and should not be used. Which do you prefer and why?
The host issue about the use of cameras in public is widely discussed among today's society. Some argues that people definitely are supposed to take advantage of cameras, which enable us to have a safer live by taking photos when participating in activities in public. However, I disagree.
Admittedly, cameras somewhat facilitate citizens' lives, as they instruct them with advanced technology to record their trace. For example, if a minor carrying a camera is used to take photos when being outside, his/her families would decrease their concerns and hence focus in their works. Yet, if viewed from a different angle, it also elevates the chances to expose children's information to outsiders. That is, in the same case, if a kidnapper is familiar with the basic information of parents, the children are more likely to believe him and even be spirited away. Besides, there are more better methods resolving this issue, such as keeping into touch with family members, avoiding going somewhere with too less people and so forth. Thus, not only do cameras fail to guarantee safety, but they also lead to other dangers.
For starters, in certain cases, taking photos is inappropriate. For example, when visiting some historical relics, we always see some pointers forbidding taking pictures, as this flash light would do harm to some chemical substances like the varnish of surface. In this situation, one taking photos without considering pros and cons would be regarded as rude and selfish. Besides, it is not hard to imagine that someone may be unwilling to be involved in photos. If a FBI or polite officer is being taken a candid photograph when executing a task unwittingly, like stalking a criminal, the photo may become the fatal evidence for him which would give rise to a tragedy. Therefore, in such cases, cameras would impose negative effects and should be set aside.
In addition, it is obvious that taking photos sometimes make individuals forget what is more invaluable. Some ones would like to take cameras wherever he goes. It is ok if only serving as an interest, whereas cameras should not dominate people's whole lives, since people would overlook the nature and well-being. in the real lives. Take my uncle as an example. Every time going traveling, he undoubtedly would carry his camera and take photos all the way. By contrast, I prefer to enjoy the process of appreciating the gorgeous scenery, chance events and local people. After a traveling, these experiences and emotion always linger in my mind and inspire me in the future. Though it is the case that my uncle could say that he has saved all the scenery exactly in his cameras, I also have access to these photos through various ways, such as the Internet or TV programs, where demonstrates more professional and elegant pictures.
All in all, despite the dubious merits, it is worth putting aside cameras, as they are not proper oftentimes and distract people from the spiritual enjoy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-14 | Angelina2016 | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another 70
- All university student should be required to take history course no matter what their field study is? 70
- Technology designed to make people s lives simpler often turn out to make them more complicated 76
- 47-integrated writing 3
- It is easier to remain healthy today. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...en be spirited away. Besides, there are more better methods resolving this issue, such as k...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...bers, avoiding going somewhere with too less people and so forth. Thus, not only do ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... unwilling to be involved in photos. If a FBI or polite officer is being taken a ...
^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...uld overlook the nature and well-being. in the real lives. Take my uncle as an exa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, in addition, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02631578947 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60758368951 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582995951417 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 807.3 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1707005287 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.32 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.76 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184448642911 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458161663738 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444169404354 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994415501247 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369316277081 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.