Apparently, there has been a historical debate about the reality of reaching the North pole by Robert e beary .
Apparently, there has been a historical debate about the reality of reaching the North pole by Robert e beary . A group of scientist support Robert in his claiming, as the author does in the reading passage, while another group cast the doubt about the honesty of this story, who represented by the professor in the lecture.
First of all, the professor contends that the national geographic committee can not be considered as a good evidence, because this committee was formed by Robert friends, also, they funded Robert journey at the beginning, in addition, they finished their record just in two days as Robert himself said, from the above, it is clear that we can not rely on this report, because it is bias and unprecise.
Second, the lecture refutes the comparison between Robert expedition and Avary, the professor thinks that Avery's journey was completeley different, as long as, every did not carry his food with him, he get his food from airplane, that mean it had less weight, also, he did his traveling in different conditions. By this point, the professor knocks down the second evidence which suggests by the author to support Robert story.
Finally, the professor critics the author evidence about the photographs that had been taken by Robert in the north pole, he adds, these photos had been taken a hundred years ago, by a primitive camera, so the technology to predict the exact position, did not precise, also, the photos colors may fade with the time.
In sum, the professor explains why he does not trust Robert story and he gives convincing explanations for each point raised by the author in the reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-05 | nahid77777777 | 60 | view |
| 2017-03-21 | Sura1988 | 76 | view |
- Apparently, there has been a historical debate about the reality of reaching the North pole by Robert e beary . 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statementSuccessful people try new things and take risks rather than what they already know how to do well. 66
- Recently, there has been a historical debate about the usage of a vessel that had been discovered in Iraq, 70
- Apparently, there has been a debate between scientists about the causes of the ice age 80
- Apparently, there has been a debate about the advantage of the growing of genetically modified trees, 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eaching the North pole by Robert e beary . A group of scientist support Robert in ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ented by the professor in the lecture. First of all, the professor contends tha...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irst of all, the professor contends that the national geographic committee can no...
^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Robert) must be used with a third-person verb: 'journeys'.
Suggestion: journeys
...obert friends, also, they funded Robert journey at the beginning, in addition, they fin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt, because it is bias and unprecise. Second, the lecture refutes the comparis...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...ery did not carry his food with him, he get his food from airplane, that mean it ha...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by the author to support Robert story. Finally, the professor critics the autho...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... photos colors may fade with the time. In sum, the professor explains why he do...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, finally, first, if, may, second, so, while, as for, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90287769784 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50752647186 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571942446043 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.23854119 49.2860985944 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 194.714285714 110.228320801 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.7142857143 21.698381199 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5714285714 7.06452816374 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278366107407 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19770089346 0.0996497079465 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.330156028337 0.0662205650399 499% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157257196973 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175367780204 0.0443174109184 396% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.3589403974 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 53.8541721854 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.0289183223 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.