The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
The line graph compares how many books were read by both genders at Burnaby Public Library over a period of 4 years.
It is clear that the number of books read by men increased over the period shown. Additionally, there was a significant fall in the figure for women in 2014, although women read more books than men from 2011 to 2013.
For men, men readers rose steadily from about 3000 books to 4000 books in the 2011-2012 period. After that, the figure went up rapidly to a peak of 14000 books in 2014 and became the highest figure in the line graph.
For women, the number of books read by women was higher than men from roughly 5000 books in 2011 to 8000 books in 2012. In 2013, this figure grew significantly and reached the highest point of 10000 books. However, one year later, the figure for women declined sharply by 8000 books in 2014.
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 61
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 73
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y women was higher than men from roughly 5000 books in 2011 to 8000 books in 2012...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 695.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45512820513 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.08713656795 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9934199132 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.875 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464405742776 0.215688989381 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202384973567 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111306984278 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291327450699 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469638707422 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.