The charts compare developing and industrialised countries in terms of the average years of schooling, the numbers of scientists and technicians and the money spent on research and development.
Overall, the figures for industrialised countries were much higher than those for developing countries. The charts also illustrate increases in participation, except in the spending aspect.
In 1980, people in developing countries attended school for an average of nearly 3 years and this figure just increased slightly over the decade. Meanwhile, the figures for industrialised countries rose from almost 9 years to more than 10 years.
After 10 years, the number of scientists and technicians in developed countries saw a significant growth, from just above 40 to around 70 per 1000 people. Likewise, the money spent on research and development in those countries experienced an almost two-fold rise, from above $150 billion to around $350 billion. By contrast, in developing countries, the numbers of specialists in this field was just under 20 per 1000 and the spending even fell from $50 billion to about $25 billion.
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 88
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 58
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('almost') instead an adjective, or a noun ('two-fold') instead of another adjective.
...elopment in those countries experienced an almost two-fold rise, from above 50 billion to around 5...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39428571429 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09325005752 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2630738167 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184642318426 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902012269064 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422240971182 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130799314514 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331030108594 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.