When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Nowadays, the education is an open corridor to success in life and the methods of teaching are very different. Many people deem that if students work together, they will learn much more. However, other people hold an opposite view that if teachers ask students to work alone on a project, it will be more useful for students. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelming. Among the two opinions. I agree with the former one more, and in the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this opinion.
First and foremost, the findings of psychological researchers show this fact that students can easily solve problems with cooperation. They can listen to the different solutions and it is very instructive for them. For example, when I and my friend worked on a project, we were able to find the great ideas for that and we got a high grade for a project. Moreover, students do not waste time to find solutions and it has an important value for them because they are very busy during school time.
Second, there is another reason that deserves some words here. In this kind of projects, students learn about how to behave with each other. Each student has a specific behavior which it may make problem to complete the project. If students want to be successful, they should learn about social behavior so that it will have countless advantages for their future. Because they must work with different people in the society and it is a useful experience. For instance, my brother was not very successful to do this kind of projects due to he could not explain his ideas in a group and he preferred to do it alone. After a while, his teacher referred to some points how he could discuss his opinions. Today, he is a good worker and connects with other people perfectly because he learns good points when he was a student.
To draw a conclusion, from what I discussed above, I safely come to the conclusion that it is necessary that students work with each other on a project. Not only can they solve the problems of the project but also improve their social behavior.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 60
- the decline of bird populations 73
- For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 61
- Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 55
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73015873016 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60260457475 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1944747165 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321668188917 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909181152152 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904332940699 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188503298217 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513262808118 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.