The first charts below illustrate the number of the inhabitants during 300 years from the year 1700 to 2000 and the rate of the death and birth during these years is compared in England and wales.
According to the first bar chart, it is clearly manifest that the population of England and Wales were following an upward trend during these years and from approximately 9 millions (the year 1700) climbed to noticeable amount near 49 millions ( in the year 200).
On the other hand, when it comes to second charts, the birth rate was the lowest (almost 9 per 1000) in 1700, while the rate of death was almost more than 6 per 1000. By the years 1800 both death and birth reached its peak rate by almost 16 and 22.5 (per 1000) respectively. However, both of these phenomena experienced swift drop subsequently and accounted for close 11 and 5 (per person) for birth and death rates in 2000.
To sum up, it is distinctively demonstrated that the population faced dramatic rise during these years, although the birth and death rate was almost as much as the earlier year.
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 11
- You are going to another country to study You would like to do a part time job while you are studying so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help Write a letter to this friend In your letter give details of your study plansexplain why yo 92
- increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree? what other measures do you think might be effective. 78
- Today, more and more students decide to move to a different country for higher studies.Do you think that the benefits of this outweighs the problems? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to noticeable amount near 49 millions in the year 200. On the other hand, w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6455026455 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44331039454 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544973544974 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0909285909 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.333333333 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23423635472 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122315625534 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386938176519 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144706246402 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369910506776 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.