The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of four different means of transport in Edmonton. The table shows data about the reasons for using car in the same city.
Overall, the chart indicates that the proportion of cars is the highest figure. The table shows that most of the people use cars to commute to work.
Among four different kinds of transport, the percentage of cars was highest, at 45% while this figure for light rail transit was slightly lower, at 35%. The proportion of buses and trains used by the citizens was similar, at 10%.
In term of reasons for using cars in the city, more than half of people (55%) use cars for commuting to work. 45% of residents drive for business compared with 40% of people use cars to take children to school. The percentage of people who commute by cars in order to go shopping or to do leisure activities was similar, at 15% for each.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Spring2019 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | mohammad.iraf | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | rose_3012 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | www.www | 78 | view |
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 56
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries 75
- The pie chart shows the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 724.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5534591195 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37612693134 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540880503145 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5753064626 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4444444444 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221237978098 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105448822873 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419218804112 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149652336319 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387208919309 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.