People try new dangerous sports such as sky-diving or rock climbing. Should such sports be banned?
Games are considered as the most suitable to remain physically and mentally fit. However, from the last few years, people have had initiated playing few treacherous (risky, dangerous, hazardous) sports, for instance sky-diving or rock-climbing. In my opinion, Government should regulate such sports so as to avoid risks and accidents.
It is refutable, that Government ban such sports because these sports add thrill to people’s life. They play such games to enjoy and increase their enthusiasm and self-confidence. These activities make them tough psychologically too. For instance, activities like rock-climbing improves climber’s stamina and they learn how to act in tough situations as they need to take speedy decision at each moment. At any rate, putting a ban will force them to perform “it in private that will” further enhance the risk of injuries or even death. Also they would not be able to get any help in case of any emergency.
On the contrary, Government must take several measures to reduce the risks associated with such sports. At the first instance, it must be obligatory to attend some training sessions and attain certificates of completion before taking part in dangerous sports. Experts from these academies guide people to use various tactics to avoid any catastrophic incidents. Furthermore, performers should take support from the trainers while playing the games. They can help people enjoy the activities in best possible manner with least risk.
To put it in a nutshell, banning the dangerous sports sill not act as a possible solution. Rather, administration can make it compulsory for people to fulfill their relevant training, also netizens must enjoy the games in presence of experts.
Comments
Pretty good post. I just…
Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. Big thanks for the useful info learn more
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... Government should regulate such sports so as to avoid risks and accidents. It is ref...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nce the risk of injuries or even death. Also they would not be able to get any help ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...ey can help people enjoy the activities in best possible manner with least risk. To ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
... the activities in best possible manner with least risk. To put it in a nutshell, banni...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...it in a nutshell, banning the dangerous sports sill not act as a possible solution. Ra...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, at any rate, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40293040293 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98239139871 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.675402941 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272020976406 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079772432416 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086306479744 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156625167631 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489191518105 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.