The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the percentage of expenditure which were spent by residents on three sections in five distinct nations Ireland, Italy, Spanish, Sweden and Turkey in the year 2002.
Overall, foods, drinks and Tobacco were items which were used the most popular in five countries while the proportion of leisure and education were the smallest.
It is clearly seen that foods, drinks and tobacco were the most important position on consumer spending in all of five countries. The highest proportion of these items was Turkey with 32,14% while Ireland was the second rank with 28,91%. The percentage of this category in the other countries made up 16,36%; 18,80% and 15,77% in Italy, Spain and Sweden respectively.
Regarding of clothing and footwear, country - dwellers spent under 10%. In Italy, this figure was 9% and in Sweden, it was 5,40%. The rate of national consumer expenditure by this kind of commodity in other three countries fluctuated around 6,5%. in terms of leisure and education, all five nations have small percentage. In detailed, the proportion in Turkey was 4,35% whilst in other four countries were under 4%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-28 | mr.cuong95 | 56 | view |
| 2014-02-24 | selly | 70 | view |
- 1.The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 65
- The charts below show the destination of secondary school leavers for young Australians in 1980 1990 and 2000 47
- 9.In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think that more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual well-being.What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 95
- The pie charts below show 5 reasons why people chose to leave stayed in the UK 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these items was Turkey with 32,14% while Ireland was the second rank with 28,91%....
^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...three countries fluctuated around 6,5%. in terms of leisure and education, all fiv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, second, well, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19565217391 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55432716972 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9763084041 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112271791712 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459440325247 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268568518285 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731262568403 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00480015145955 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.