tpo integrated 17
Both the reading and the lecture talk bout the effect of agriculture on birds. The reading claims that the population of birds decline due to increase in the agriculture. However the lecture disagrees. it claims that the reading points are unconvincing.
First, the reading states that the population of the humans increase, which lead to decline in the population of the birds. For example, people start to destroy the bird’s habitat to build their own homes. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims that some bird’s habitat decrease but other birds population increase in the urban areas. For example, there are better and large habitat for sea gull and hook in the urban areas.
Second, the reading states that agriculture causes decline of bird’s habitat in the rural areas. For example, as agriculture increase more wildness lands were needed as well. But, the lecture disagrees. It claims that increase in the agriculture do not means increase in the use of lands. On the other hand, it meant increase in the number of crops planted, It means more food per unite of land no need to destroy wildness lands. harm the bird at all. For example, there are changes occur in the pesticides synthetic.
Third, the reading states that the uses of pesticides lead to decline in the bird’s habitat. For example, pesticides are incorporated in the food and the water chain of the birds, which eventually cause decline in the bird’s population. Yet, the lecture disagrees. It claims that pesticides are not responsible for the decline of birds population. For example, first, new and less toxic pesticides are now available. Second, pesticides resistant crops are developed which do not harm the birds at all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 73
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- tpo 34 integrated 73
- All university students should required to talk history courses not matter what is their field . 70
- tpo 19 integrated 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ine due to increase in the agriculture. However the lecture disagrees. it claims that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...culture. However the lecture disagrees. it claims that the reading points are unco...
^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'?
Suggestion: mean
...that increase in the agriculture do not means increase in the use of lands. On the ot...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 436, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Harm
...land no need to destroy wildness lands. harm the bird at all. For example, there are...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, well, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19434628975 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69669885129 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.395759717314 0.540411800872 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8682585534 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.8181818182 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8636363636 21.698381199 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347961308548 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115447740661 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845432866048 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2290461196 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714302961384 0.0443174109184 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.93 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.58 8.42419426049 78% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.