the maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps indicate the main changes which have taken place in the town of Kimsville between the year 2002 and today.
Overall, It is noticed that Kimsville has become much more modern city, with more buildings and transport facilities.
It can be seen that the west of the city used to be a green area with a lot of trees, but the trees have been cut down to make way for new apartments and football stadium. It has been urbanized since 2002. Another striking change is that a new train station has been constructed, which contribute on developing of transport.
If we look at the cinema in 2002, it has been turned into a pub, where makes the city more vibrant. A final interesting development has been the conversion of a factory, which used to a concern of pollution because of its smoke, replacing by a software company.
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Internet users as percentage of population. 78
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010. 67
- the graph and table show info about water use worldwide and water consumption in 2 countries. 73
- Internet users as percentage of population. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 682.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57718120805 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56073471507 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651006711409 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8105542774 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4285714286 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0876550044438 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394715489859 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049171975577 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565821798654 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536598781383 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.