TPO 16 - Integrated
The author believes that the science of archeology had faced a lot of difficulties and problems in the twentieth century in Britain. The lecturer, however, argues that new rules established at 1990, improved conditions of archeology significantly.
First, the author states that growth in construction projects in the britain lead to destruction of plenty of archeologically valuable sites, and constructors failed to preserve probable existing artifacts. On the contrary, the lecturer purposes that the new rule obliged constructors to examine a field for artifacts prior to beggining the construction process. If the field contained artifacts, the construction would continue either after excavation or in somewhere around the site.
Second, the author explains that there were insufficient funds for archelogical activities back then. On the other hand, the lecturer suggests that the new rule imposed the expenses of examination and excavation of valuable sites to the construction companies. This was rather a new, yet massive source of financial support for archeology.
Finally, the author states that Britain suffered from shortage of jobs in the field of archeology. However, the lecturer argues that the new rule provided people with plenty of opportunities in archeology, and this scientific field is thriving at the moment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-19 | saeedpanahi | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-02 | Cyclic Order | 85 | view |
| 2018-11-01 | Dragut | 88 | view |
| 2017-07-03 | a_hosseini | 81 | view |
- TPO 25 81
- Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- TPO 26 76
- Do you agree or disagree: “In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.”? 83
- In general people are living longer now. Discuss the causes of this phenomenon. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69154228856 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14710339766 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572139303483 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8693462444 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188675075422 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771747771121 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268985713444 0.0662205650399 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113175289709 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431561628095 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.