It is argued that offenders who have been reintegrated back into society are the first option acting as a deterrent of teenager criminals. In my opinion, I totally agree with this helpful idea in order to diminish national crime rates.
There are many reasons for people to believe that a conversation between a released offender and teenagers could become so meaningful. Firstly, perhaps the people who have been served a prison sentence can be a living example which could warn young generation of intense consequences in breaking the laws. The listeners who may unwilling to obey the laws in the past would have a clear vision of wrongdoers’ future and could turn to law abiding citizens after that. Secondly, from the speakers’ perspective, they will feel more thankful and then will realize that they also have responsibilities to society through helping government to prevent unlawful actions. Therefore, their abilities of re-offending could be depleted and friendly actions could be taken.
Although some alternatives instead of reformed offenders could be taken, the results might be less effective. It is easy to replace the gap by a police officers or lectures which documentary films are shown, but these old teaching methods have been result in minor progress on students’ behaviors. For example, teachers can show their children a film of good citizens be like and how it tries to transfer some government laws. The result is students frequent consider these methods just as boring theories and simply ignore them.
In conclusion, if the conversation between reformed offenders and teenagers are well prepared, this trend of teaching can be the best option in crime prevent education.
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32600732601 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9248711524 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3894012696 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188433006402 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651998916243 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043358102412 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107209447622 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287589097573 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.