Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of the corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
"Corporations have a responsiblity to promote the well being of the societies and enviroment" this view of the issue closely align with my own point of view. Not only Corporations, it is the moral duty of every individual to care for environments and society, to check if their actions, directly or indirectly hamper the harmony or equilibrium of the society or enivronments. Corporations are central to the growth of city, growth of nation but at the same time, the recent news about corruption by corporations in environmental issues, for example VolksWagen, a premier german automobile company, was recently charged with its new range of automobile not maintaing the pollution standards, somewhat provides us a signal that we need to have even more srtingent laws to take care about the corruption by the firms, at the same we as human being need more aware towards betterment of environment and the society.
A founder of the corporation obviously builds his firms to earn money, which is not wrong, but at the same time monetary benefits should not be its sole objective , for example consider a Chemical Fertilizer Company X, a leader in chemical fertilizers, has it plant near a city, which have around lakh inhabitants with varing income groups. Let us say that the company X is located in vicinity of the residential complex and the waste from the company is dumbed near the river side which happen to be source of water for the day today use of the inhabitants. Obviously the permission to set up a chemical fertilizer company was given by the City Muncipal Council also the company is found to follow the all the laws under Environment Protection Act and the waste dumped by the company is near the river lie with in the limits of standards sanctioned by Environmental Protection Agency. Obviously the company is not under any fault, but it is also a responsibilty of the company to be careful when dumping the waste near riverside, even if waste it dumps near the riverside are within the limits, they should be careful in doing so because the water of river is used for day to day work by the city inahbitants. The company should make an effort to install additonal water purifiers or some technology which purifies the river water before reaching to the inhabitants.At the sametime the government should motivate the company by giving subsidies on certain taxes, also providing some financial support to the company in developing the purification plant.
In this way the Corporations should promote well-being of the society and enviroment in which they operate.
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situ 38
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Socks, Inc."A recent study of Dura-Socks customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our 33
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 85
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 65
- Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs a 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly hamper the harmony or equilibrium of the society or enivronments. Corporation...
^^
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...builds his firms to earn money, which is not wrong, but at the same time monetary...
^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...enefits should not be its sole objective , for example consider a Chemical Fertili...
^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'plants'?
Suggestion: plants
... leader in chemical fertilizers, has it plant near a city, which have around lakh inh...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 840, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iver lie with in the limits of standards sanctioned by Environmental Protection A...
^^
Line 2, column 1381, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...ater before reaching to the inhabitants.At the sametime the government should moti...
^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld promote well-being of the society and enviroment in which they operate.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00692840647 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98157483314 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512702078522 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 48.0 23.0359550562 208% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.448092502 60.3974514979 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 240.888888889 118.986275619 202% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 48.1111111111 23.4991977007 205% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186201001174 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962104928711 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827642485402 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185119609081 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965816654673 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.2 14.1392134831 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.76 48.8420337079 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 12.1743820225 181% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.67 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.8971910112 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 21.2 11.2143820225 189% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.