Education is one the most important factors contributing to not only an individual's but nation's future too. Succsuess of a country depends on how well educated it's citizens are. Therefore, the government should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted but can't afford the tuition.
A university degree equips the students with necessary professional skills. But it evident that tuition fee cost has increased over time and families are finding it more and more difficult to send their children to college. In these circumstances there are many deserving students who do not go to college because their families can't afford it. Making education free for such students would create each and every citizen an equal opportunity to study and excel. Free education to the poor students make sure that each student gets equal opportunity to make a good career. Making sure that everyone gets equal opportunity the country will contribute in making a society will less inequality. A place where each and every citizen irrespective of his economic conditions can dream of a good future.
It is often criticized that giving away subsidies impacts a country's economy negatively. But giving free education only to students those who can't afford would ensure that the tax payer's money is utilized in most efficient way. An investment made in education pays rich dividends in future. Not only an educated citizens would form a competent workforce, they would contribute to nation's economy too. In short run it may appear that the government would be spending money but in long run the nation can reap significant benefits from the investment.
Thus, implementing this policy would results in positive impact to the nation's society, will make a skilled workforce which would build nation's economy as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...ortant factors contributing to not only an individuals but nations future too. Succsuess of a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o any student who has been admitted but cant afford the tuition. A university de...
^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ot go to college because their families cant afford it. Making education free for su...
^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ee education only to students those who cant afford would ensure that the tax payers...
^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...t made in education pays rich dividends in future. Not only an educated citizens would fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'citizen'?
Suggestion: citizen
...vidends in future. Not only an educated citizens would form a competent workforce, they ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
... Thus, implementing this policy would results in positive impact to the nations socie...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...would results in positive impact to the nations society, will make a skilled workforce ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 294.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21768707483 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7047468484 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568027210884 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7691375451 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.875 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0625 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280870505271 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100687027558 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179244022613 0.0758088955206 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18098851693 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165222905878 0.0667264976115 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.