In my opinion good sense of humor is a must for every individual. Sense of humor means to take or make up a situation lightly rather than getting serious. The people who get serious on all decisions and tasks seems to be boring and the one cannot enjoy life. Good sense of humor helps the individual to make out way in difficult situation without much getting affected by it. People with this ability tend to be more creative and are better at finding innovative solutions to problem.
As described above, people with good sense of humor enjoy life. Talking about human phycology, people remember more of happier moments than sad. Enjoying each and every moment makes not only people live that moment but also builds its intellectual ability. The people with good sense of humor learn from every moment of their life as they actively participate every where. And with this participation they not only develop thinking ability but can also avoid difficult situation diplomatically.
The second point, people with good sense of humor are more creative and can tackle problems in different and sophisticated way. It is not that this type of people aren't serious, but they think of the problem seriously but doesn't let the internal fellings peep out. I have tw personal experience on this topic. First when I was in 5th standard, I got serious about a small mistake, and because of my expressions at that moment, students made fun out of me. And the second, when I was in University, I forgot to take out Cell phone during exam, and then the checking squad came, if I had got caught then I would have suspended for a semester. But signalled university professor the entire situation, and he himself came and took my phone from me. And fortunately I was the one among some students who were checked for such things.
So people with good sense of humor not only lives life more happily, but also during difficult times can think openly without getting serious and blank. So in my view good sense of humor is important human quality.
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 66
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 66
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 50
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 58
- The origin of life was highly speculative until agraduate student at the University of Chicago, Stanley Miller designed and conducted an empirical research project under the guidance of his graduate advisor, Harold Urey. In this classic experiment, the re 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...their life as they actively participate every where. And with this participation they not o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...way. It is not that this type of people arent serious, but they think of the problem ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...they think of the problem seriously but doesnt let the internal fellings peep out. I h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, talking about, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76770538244 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46388580369 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529745042493 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3654790391 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5789473684 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163465484519 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629673130331 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622857562712 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121962885126 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495097007973 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.