Presumably, in the last decades, technology has grown in astounding ways. I am totally in favour of machine translations being nowhere near as precise as human translators and i cannot imagine of human translators being usurped by device translators in the future. This essay will support my opinion with relevant examples.
On one hand, generally speaking, the majority of human translators are native speakers. Unlike machine interpreters, humans remain distinctly familiar with all of its subtlety, slang, expression, grammar and so on, which play a significant role in maintaining and retaining...
- As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 90
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to choose this. 96
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 69
- Some people believe that modern designs for schools and offices with more open spaces are necessary What are the advantages and disadvantages of such spaces Give your opinion 52
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree? 75
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 361 350
No. of Characters: 1991 1500
No. of Different Words: 235 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.359 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.515 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.063 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 151 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 124 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 90 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 67 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.056 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.86 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.275 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.45 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.031 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ear as precise as human translators and i cannot imagine of human translators bei...
^
Line 3, column 869, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gh possibility of grammatical errors and sentence structures becoming less organi...
^^
Line 3, column 1085, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect understanding of text is essential. On the other hand, advocates of automati...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: KEY_WORDS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keywords'?
Suggestion: keywords
.... Not only would machine memorise tough key words but also they would maintain the consis...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6703601108 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14447261778 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662049861496 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2717376908 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.722222222 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260333990254 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693576665239 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588914217702 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171822850761 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372573960407 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.