The maps show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development.
The given maps demonstrate some major changes to a small town called Islip. Overall, the town center will develop into a more modernized and residential location as the countryside size will be reduced dramatically.
One of the town significant renovations will be the structure of the main road, as it will become a dual carriageway circulating the town center instead of the straight main road. Also, one of the lines of shops facing each other across the main road will be demolished to make room for other facilities in the town center. In the northern part of the center, a new bus station, a shopping center, as well as a car park, will be built facing a separated road only for pedestrians, which will be in front of the remaining line of shops. In the southeast of the center, there is a park, which will be kept but cut in size within the circle. The school in the southwest will be in the same place just outside the town center. In addition, there would be 2 new housing areas built in the town center circle instead of only 2 now.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-09-23 | lethianhthu | 73 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- The given picture shows the process of making electricity from coal 80
- News plays an important part in most people s lives and news media has become more influential in people s lives Why do you think this is the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. Discuss bo 73
- The graph shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50526315789 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56643581603 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521052631579 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7346342334 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213906763701 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116894582658 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730162086802 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192431679798 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040745751977 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.