TPO_42
The reading passage states that glass which is used in buildings is dangerous for wild birds because they cannot distinguish between glass and open air, so they try to fly through it and they are harmed. The article provides three solutions for this problem. However, the professor explains that none of the solutions are effective and refutes all of them.
First, the article claims that by replacing of clear glass with one-way glass, the birds will distinguish the glass. The lecturer refutes this solution by saying that one-way glass is like mirror and birds do not understand mirror. He explains that birds will see the reflection of sky or trees on the glass and they will try to fly on it which leads to damage them.
Second, the reading passage states that by painting colorful lines or other designs on window, birds can distinguish the glass. The professor opposes this point by saying that the birds will see the open spaces between lines as holes and will fly right through them. He says that for solving this problem, designs should be very close with small open areas and this kind of designs make the inside of buildings too dark for people.
Finally, the article holds the view that using magnetic fields in the buildings will guide birds away from buildings. However, the professor casts doubt on this view and contends that the birds use magnetic fields to find their way in long trips. He explains that the birds use their eyes or brightness to fly in short distances.
Overall, while the passage brings three solutions to solve the problem of building glass for birds, the lecturer prefers to differ by providing counter arguments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Pariakarimi | 80 | view |
- teachers respect 70
- Zoos 70
- Rembrandt painting 68
- It has been said, “Not everything that is learned is contained in books.” Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? 70
- People today spent too much time on personal enjoyment "doing things they like do rather than things they should do. 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, in short, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86219081272 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24042201749 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487632508834 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3399465599 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.846153846 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544131018688 0.272083759551 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19484507675 0.0996497079465 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107560901811 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288465178311 0.162205337803 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100721794972 0.0443174109184 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.