In recent decades, more attention has been attarceted toward education and the quality of teaching. No one can deny the effect of knowledge in the science-based world where all people put all their efforts to be prosperous in life. We all know that the most crucial elements regarding to education are teachers and their methods for conveying knowledge and learning students. Scholar have been searching about the best methods of teaching in order to enhance the learning efficiency. In this regard, a contentious question about arises and that is whether working in group to do assignments is practical or working alone. As a matter of fact, both sides have their own benefits and one should take into account this fact that students should consider their own condition. From my prespective, I think working in group is worthwile to take time rather than doing project solely. In what follows, I will elaborate my outstanding point of view on this issue.
The first exquisite point of view is that group working has myriad benefits that are not camparable with working individually. One conspicuous advantage of doing together is that the projects are so solvable since it would be divided into several parts each of which are assigned to each member. Consequently, no difficult burgeon would be on the shoulder of students. For example, many students cannot recieve high grades due to the fact that they are not able to do their assignment on the due time because they do not have enough time to finish them perfectly. However, if they partition their time and have less homework for each credits, they are more likely to pass their exams with higher grades.
Another subtle point to be mentioned is that members not only can be familiar with other people's stances, but also they can exert their opinions to improve efficiency. For instance, while working in group project, it is more likely for students to hear either opposite or concurrent view points. This would be a golden opportunity to make use of these points to proliferate their action and thrive. Moreover, the teachers can benefit from this task since they can evaluate their performance and try to improve their methods in this way.
To put it briefly, contemplating all reasons and factors, one soon realizes that working together not only have plenty of advantages such as low amount of work with high efficiency and yeild, but also it is a good way to learn more about others' attitudes. I recommend that teachers be aware of effects of working in group and exert this method for projects and assignments.
- TPO 18-1 78
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 86
- TPO 15-1 3
- tpo17-1 80
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... one soon realizes that working together not only have plenty of advantages such ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95161290323 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61178240576 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2938258751 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.105263158 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8421052632 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193186255414 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633175412566 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476588560793 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132599362017 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277843889945 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.