The Bar graph illustrates the change of transport modes over three different time period for a European city.
Overall, used of car was chronologically increased over that period, but used of bus was decline over that same time frame. In the case of transportation mode train and tube are fluctuated over the time but over that period used of train increased form the starting year and used of tube fall slide form the base starting year.
In the year 1960, bus was the most suitable mode of transport it almost 38% and it was the height at that time, however over the time priority uses of bus was declined 24% and at 2000 level it was 15%.In 1960, trains and tubs also popular approximately train 19% and tubs roughly 28%. Uses of tube was decreased only 3% in 1960 to 2000(28% to 25%). In the case of trains percentage of commuter was increased almost 3% from the base year.
Between 1960 and 2000, the user of cars was increased high almost 31% over that time frame. In 1960 it was 7 % only after 20 years it increased to 23% and in 2000 it raised at 38% level. So, over that 40 year time popularity of cars was increased the most.
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- TPO 42 76
- It is more important for universities to invest in infrastructure and physical plant than to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 18. Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Agree/ disagree? 66
- Should education and health care be free of charge and funded by the government or should it be the responsibility of the people to pay for these services Discuss the above and give your opinion using example 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...arting year and used of tube fall slide form the base starting year. In the year ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...clined 24% and at 2000 level it was 15%.In 1960, trains and tubs also popular appr...
^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...clined 24% and at 2000 level it was 15%.In 1960, trains and tubs also popular appr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44761904762 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34735465955 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471428571429 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5905727244 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156948838054 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830672561694 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521997877084 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122116500937 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501373935213 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.