Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn lot of money, others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both the views and give you own opinion.
Nowadays, many people are earning enormous package but their personal lives have more troubles. However, some workers get meager salary with satisfied jobs enable them to deliver quality work. In the following passage, I will explain both the views before declaring my stance.
Most of the corporate employees are drawing huge package, yet their family lives are having so much of internal issues. The expectation from the organization is beyond the limit where they spend less time with their children. For instance, my friend works at Amazon incorporation, he works for more than 12 hours a day, sacrificing important family occasions. Moreover, they need to constantly improve their knowledge to compete with their peers. Additionally, there is continues job risk which spoils many employee’s pleasures time. Also, constant pressure to deliver quality work can hinder their peace. Therefore, it is believed, employees earning huge package tend to lose family values because of constant job threat.
Do employees need to work of their interest? Yes. When staffs enjoy the work, this will bring more happiness among their dependents and it helps them to deliver optimum work all times. Furthermore, the passion towards their work thrive them to explore avenue of opportunities which creates more profit for the companies. In addition, the quality time spend with their children enables them to be peace at work. For example, my neighbor works at TBS, his passion to work is very admirable which aid him to reach management layer at very early age. Thus, it is assumed, if staff’s life their work then firms will ripe fantastic results.
To sum up, as the proverb says, “work is worship”, it is always vital to work of interest along with marked standard salary rather than, earning exhaustive package by spoiling personal commitments won’t help both the organization as well as to their employees.
- In many countries very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Y 82
- Today people spend more time travelling to work than before. Some people suggest employers should allow employees to do some work home. Do you think that advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Cycling is more environment friendly than other forms of transport. Why it is not popular in many places? How can its popular be increased? 78
- some people think that plastic shopping bags should be prohibited because they are one of the major pollutants of both land and water around the world I completely agree but I think there are other measures that can be taken before putting a complete ban 55
- People don t read newspapers or watch tv news but they rely on internet for news Is that positive or negative development 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...s won't help both the organization as well as to their employees.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30392156863 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70885071311 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.528028518 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0957973656294 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355166596882 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035162563311 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794885810399 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052330484096 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.