Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older?
Indulgent children is gradually becoming a tendency of parents, recently, and there is no doubt that it is absolutely failing method to raise children. This essay explores the different grounds why this educational way is negative as well as gives the serious results of this.
Educating children always requires the accurate and practical directions. The best way to raise a child is truly acknowledging between the requirements and boundaries, more importantly, parents should learn how to say "No" with their children. Ironically, many parents, who think indulgent is suitable for their children, literally believe that the freedom is the most vital and essential factor to make their children a happy life. However, were they to think carefully about this stance, they would regconize that giving children the right to do whaterver they want when their cognition is not completed, can lead to the inaccurate consequences instead of the pink life as they thought.
One of the detrimental results of this education method is the increase of juvenile delinquency, undoubtedly. Children who are always indulged by their parents, can become a self-centred person- who never pay attention to anyone's feeling or thinking. In other worlds, they allow themself to do everything such as bullying or harassing the others to only get what they want, and when their behavior is out of their parents' control, breaking the laws or offending is not impossible to happen. Secondly, because of high expectation their parents have given, when facing to the reality, children can be extremely disappointed. Such a negativiy inside can attack their feeling, and then, they try to isolate themselves from the whole world. As a result, solitude and depresion is impossible to prevent.
In conclusion, choosing the right way to raise the next generation is very vital. Instead of focusing on what children want, parents should teach them what the limitation in reality is.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Arezooo | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | el-naz | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | spumoni | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | Falola helen Oluwatoyin | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-10 | 0102mickey | 61 | view |
- Health experts claim that walking is one of the best ways to keep good health, but less and less people walking in daily life. What are the reason and how to encourage people to walk more? 89
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? 53
- Essay topic: Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can government do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 84
- Health experts claim that walking is one of the best ways to keep good health, but less and less people walking in daily life. What are the reason and how to encourage people to walk more? 89
- Students leave high school without a good understanding of how to manage money. What do you think are the reasons? And give some possible solutions for this problem. 97
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30128205128 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88296248941 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4547859543 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484855981667 0.244688304435 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139845957131 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814889994455 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273541384223 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903722091861 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.