Scientific research played a vital role in raising the quality of life on this earth through the history in many aspects. Without a doubt, the technologies and developments that we have today are the fruit of the scientific contributions of the past time. As a result, it is an ongoing debate whether governments should place restrictions on scientific research and development, or the scientific research shouldn't be restrained. In my opinion, governments should place some restrictions on the scientific research, but not excessive restrictions which may impede the flourish of the science.
Scientific research has two aspects; while it can be used positively to help the humankind, also it can be used for destructive purposes. For instance, scientific research in the medical field produced an enormous number of medications, helped to cure many diseases, and lessened the mortality rates. On the other hand, scientific research produced many harmful drugs which cause addiction. Hence, governments should assure consistent restriction on the development of harmful scientific research.
Furthermore, there are many ethical aspects involved in the scientific research, such as testing on animals. Many scientific experiments use animals as a tool such as; testing on animals in cosmetics and perfume production, this issue sparks the rage of the activists in many countries. Currently, in the UK and across the rest of the EU, testing cosmetic products or their ingredients on animals is banned. Another ethical issue concerning the scientific research results fallen into the wrong hands, this might lead to a hazardous risk. For instance, many people concerned about the threat of human cloning if it is used for business benefits in the future.
In contrast, many argue that government restriction on the scientific research hinders its development since scientific research needs government support and funding to flourish. Moreover, scientists should be free from constraints to be creative and innovative, government restriction restrains their minds and lessen their passion for scientific research. This will be true if the government is as ignorant as the church banning telescope in the old ages to keep the people away from any discovery which might defeat their beliefs and enlighten their thinking. But, the government should have a planned and minimal restriction on the scientific research, not to limit the progress of scientific research.
In summary, it is the government role to assure that the scientific research benefits the humankind, and control the risks of its development and results, by placing the suitable restrictions without hampering the productivity of the scientific research.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 33
- people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwa 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- A recent survey of 250 adults between the ages of 30 and 45 showed an association between the number of hours adults spend online each day and self-reporting of symptoms commonly associated with depression. The survey found that adults who spend 30 hours 52
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... of the scientific contributions of the past time. As a result, it is an ongoing debate w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...development, or the scientific research shouldnt be restrained. In my opinion, governmen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lopment of harmful scientific research. Furthermore, there are many ethical aspe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in contrast, in summary, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2313.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56009615385 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05471155965 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490384615385 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3090398927 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449840962305 0.243740707755 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178537903769 0.0831039109588 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156321992708 0.0758088955206 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296512755771 0.150359130593 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131546111108 0.0667264976115 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.