Whether travel is a necessary component of a quality education. Discuss and give your own experience.
In this day and age, studying abroad has become a controversial debate among public around the world. Although studying in a prestigious university in more developed countries is regarded as thoroughly both destructive and negative by a considerable number of people, others held an opposing view. I am highly inclined to believe that graduating from a foreign educational institute is beneficial and could improve positive characteristic in society.
There are various reasons why traveling abroad for university education is advantageous. First and foremost, this experience plays a pivotal role in shaping students’ mindset, which is argued endlessly nowadays. this kind of influences may be attributed to the fact that living in a better atmosphere creates a sense of accomplishment and competence, which consequently open avenues to new achievements. From my own experience as an educated person, this kind of experiences has brought about a significant improvement in my future career. Therefore, the profitable effect of the foregoing matter is undeniable.
However, there is no doubt that being away from your homeland can lead to negative consequences, and it can devitalize a student with countless variables which consequently lead to depression. For instance, lots of researches conducted by Harvard University researchers in 2010 have shown that getting even high credential abroad are inversely correlated with a kind of anarchy. Hence, the drawbacks are obvious, and they can potentially impose adverse effects on people.
To conclude, weighing all the arguments up against each other, there are strong and valid points on both sides of the fence. Although studying abroad has its adverse impact on students such as devitalizing them, it can shape their mindset in a proper way that regarded as a prominent feature of traveling abroad for qualifying.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-16 | Tran Mai Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-15 | ATCHAYAPRIYA.M | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-15 | ATCHAYAPRIYA.M | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-15 | ATCHAYAPRIYA.M | 78 | view |
| 2017-11-02 | barez80 | 70 | view |
- In the past, people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- In the past, people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. 73
- Some adults believe that nowadays children’s behavior is worse than children’s behavior was in the past. These adults have suggested three actions that parents can do to help children ages 5–10 behave better (for example, by speaking more respectful 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...et, which is argued endlessly nowadays. this kind of influences may be attributed to...
^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lizing them, it can shape their mindset in a proper way that regarded as a prominent feature of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, kind of, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5574912892 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19174033278 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644599303136 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7116997516 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.692307692 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0355409688067 0.244688304435 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.011578157705 0.084324248473 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0181157178275 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0197792494239 0.151304729494 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126206858088 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.