Whether travel is a necessary component of a quality education. Discuss and give your own experience.
In this day and age, studying abroad has become a controversial debate among public around the world. Although studying in a prestigious university in more developed countries is regarded as thoroughly both destructive and negative by a considerable number of people, others held an opposing view. I am highly inclined to believe that graduating from a foreign educational institute is beneficial and could improve positive characteristic in society.
There are various reasons why traveling abroad for university education is advantageous. First and foremost, this experience plays a pivotal role in shaping students’ mindset, which is argued endlessly nowadays. this kind of influences may be attributed to the fact that living in a better atmosphere creates a sense of accomplishment and competence, which consequently open avenues to new achievements. From my own experience as an educated person, this kind of experiences has brought about a significant improvement in my future career. Therefore, the profitable effect of the foregoing matter is undeniable.
However, there is no doubt that being away from your homeland can lead to negative consequences, and it can devitalize a student with countless variables which consequently lead to depression. For instance, lots of researches conducted by Harvard University researchers in 2010 have shown that getting even high credential abroad are inversely correlated with a kind of anarchy. Hence, the drawbacks are obvious, and they can potentially impose adverse effects on people.
To conclude, weighing all the arguments up against each other, there are strong and valid points on both sides of the fence. Although studying abroad has its adverse impact on students such as devitalizing them, it can shape their mindset in a proper way that regarded as a prominent feature of traveling abroad for qualifying.
- In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today 2 95
- today's food and the past foods pros and cons. 90
- In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. 73
- In the past, people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- In the past, people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...et, which is argued endlessly nowadays. this kind of influences may be attributed to...
^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lizing them, it can shape their mindset in a proper way that regarded as a prominent feature of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, kind of, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5574912892 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19174033278 2.5805825403 124% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644599303136 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7116997516 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.692307692 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0355409688067 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.011578157705 0.0996497079465 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0181157178275 0.0662205650399 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0197792494239 0.162205337803 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126206858088 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.42419426049 122% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.