The owner argues that the decrease in the number of shoppers in central plaza is a result of the increasing of skateboarding popularity, but his argument is filled with wholes.
First, the writer is lacking the prove of the real relation between the increase of skateboarding and the increase of shoppers in the central plaza. For example, he did not state that before the skateboarding there was an increase of the shoppers, this would be a prove of correlation between the two incidents. Also, the writer would have proved his point if he surveyed the shoppers' opinions of the effects of skateboarding on their shopping experience in Central Plaza.
Moreover, the owner neglected other factors which may affect the decrease of the shoppers in Central Plaza. Online shopping, for example, played a vital role in persuading many people to shop from home. Traffic jam, parking issues, and many other factors may hamper the shoppers' numbers. Instead of building his assumption on many owners' statement, he could give a percentage of owners who believe that the skateboarding has a deterioration effect on the number of shoppers in the plaza. In contrary, maybe some store owners and shoppers find skateboarding as an attraction for more people to visit the plaza and shop there.
While the writer state that there is a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza, he did not submit any evidence to verify his assumption that skateboarding elicited these activities. Even more, he did not state the rate of the increase of vandalism and litter and since when it started. It might be increasing even before skateboarding, or other factors could promote this increase.
In conclusion, skateboarding may or may not had an effect on the shoppers' numbers. more investigation should be done to understand the association between the two activities.
- urbb 87
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 75
- So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts. 50
- many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 88
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK, this sentence:
the writer is lacking the prove of the real relation between the increase of skateboarding and the increase of shoppers in the central plaza.
should be:
the writer is lacking the prove of the real relation between the increase of skateboarding and the decrease of shoppers in the central plaza.
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
flaws:
Need to argue against the conclusion always. For this topic it is:
Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 307 350
No. of Characters: 1532 1500
No. of Different Words: 142 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.186 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.99 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.842 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 61 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.615 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.89 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.414 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.66 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.222 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...holes. First, the writer is lacking the prove of the real relation between the increa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...increase of the shoppers, this would be a prove of correlation between the two incident...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'shoppers'' or 'shopper's'?
Suggestion: shoppers'; shopper's
..., and many other factors may hamper the shoppers numbers. Instead of building his assump...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'owners'' or 'owner's'?
Suggestion: owners'; owner's
...tead of building his assumption on many owners statement, he could give a percentage o...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le to visit the plaza and shop there. While the writer state that there is a d...
^^^
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'shoppers'' or 'shopper's'?
Suggestion: shoppers'; shopper's
...ing may or may not had an effect on the shoppers numbers. more investigation should be d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: More
... had an effect on the shoppers numbers. more investigation should be done to underst...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 2260.96107784 70% => OK
No of words: 307.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14006514658 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92279896149 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 204.123752495 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465798045603 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 705.55239521 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5377504505 57.8364921388 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 119.503703932 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 23.324526521 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.70786347227 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321828736535 0.218282227539 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120815303116 0.0743258471296 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930424492219 0.0701772020484 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18869289744 0.128457276422 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100975366226 0.0628817314937 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 98.500998004 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.