Art should be free of any strains to be innovative, so we cannot judge the merit of the art by being understandable for most people. In my opinion, art loses its value when it becomes straightforward and transparent.
Serious art should not be easily interpreted, not even have one valid interpretation. Moreover, while you can say a lot about an art piece, much should remain unsayable. Real art attracts people by touching their souls and reviving their thoughts, even if they cannot comprehend the real intentions of the artist. For example, the Monaliza painting still infinitely enigmatic, while there are many interpretations trying to enrich our understanding of Leonardo's piece of art, no defined answer found to be valid enough. This what is making all the fuss about the Monaliza, and attracting thousands of people to come from all the world to stand in front of it, and make their own perceptions of her smile. So, in order for any work of art to be innovative, it should incite our imagination, feelings, and memories in our way to percept it.
Thus, persuading artists to promote accessible virtues to their ideas might cause them to produce a lot of guff, which would be repetitive and monotonous. Artists mostly have complex and contradictional ideas and feelings, what make them novel is their ability to express their ideas in artistic ways, either through novels, films, poems. Asking artists to be more understandable to most of the people will lessen impede their creativity and deter their inspiration. For instance, if an artist can give a stated explanation of his work, people will consider him naive and worthless, we can see many direct portraits around which do not spark our attention, and many artworks failed because they were predictable. In contrary, the eminent artworks which keep people wondering and perplexed become outstanding merit.
On the other hand, too complicated artworks which could be esoteric would be uninteresting for people. Artists should not build barriers between them and people, this would hinder art's crucial role in reflecting society's cultural, traditions, and values, furthermore, preserving them through the history. So, it is important for art to be reasonable to people's understanding and could be comprehensible for future generations who will receive their history through the art.
In conclusion, while art should not be exclusive and prestigious, it will lose its value when it is straightforward and predictable. People are more interested in artistic works which entice their curiosity and stimulate their thoughts, so it is not fair for art to expect it to be a commonplace.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 66
- many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 88
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 54
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 816, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and perplexed become outstanding merit. On the other hand, too complicated artwo...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...art to expect it to be a commonplace.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20046620047 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0132657149 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0352399739 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.944444444 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308949271065 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106511389062 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955290728663 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202628503262 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718792917255 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.