The statement argues that it is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them, while it seems persuasive, but it is evasive and not truly a cogent statement. Undoubted, it depends on the belief which would be comprised. Moreover, the cause which engendered this compromise.
Compromising own values and beliefs will lessen one's self-confidence and tarnish his reputation. Even more, it becomes an insidious cycle; the more we compromise our values, the more we continue to do so. For example, an employee who compromises his values and involves in corruption, he might involve in other illicit activities for the sake of better position or the money. Also, a student who might yield to his classmate and involve in cheating for the first time, this might persuade him to cheat more often instead of spending his time on studying for the exams. Thus, it is important for the person to be adamant about his values and principles, to maintain his self-esteem.
In contrast, true person, who is in pursuit of the truth, should be critical to his own beliefs, and open-minded to all other views. Only by experience, people tend to change their beliefs when they expose to others beliefs which are different from what they advocate. For instance, many of the beliefs, which a person attained in his childhood by his parent and his society, may change when he experiences different ideas and thought which make more sense to him. The human superiority came from their ability to choose their own faiths and beliefs. Truth cannot be reached without critical thinking and persistent search. So, it is more harmful to adhere our beliefs blindly, than compromising our beliefs when they are proved to be wrong.
Thus, while many beliefs and values are worth adhering to, many should be questioned and analyzed to prove their validity. So, a person should adopt critical thinking and comprehensive analysis of his beliefs and values because they affect his way of life. And more importantly, it is for the health of the society to be open-minded and accept different beliefs and values. For example, if the society is more conservative and not yielding to different beliefs, people will not accept others, As a result, discrimination or antagonism will be dominant. Societies should provoke people to accept different beliefs and opinions, to escalate the civilization and deter the vandalism.
In conclusion, while it is healthy for the person to be restricted to his values and beliefs, compromising these beliefs as consequences of deep thinking and reasonable causes is healthier.
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 75
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 54
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 89
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...sing own values and beliefs will lessen ones self-confidence and tarnish his reputat...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and reasonable causes is healthier.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2185.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11709601874 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81438423614 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48243559719 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5893179095 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1908072078 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691676734339 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567483915081 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132840232043 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742531519381 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.