"A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college."
The issue whether all the students of a country must study a common curriculum until they enter college is a debatable one. On one hand a common curriculum ensures unformity in both academic and co-curricular development while on the other hand forcing various educational boards to conform to a fixed pattern questions their autonomy. After a full analysis, I partially concur with the argument.
Requiring students to study a fixed curriculum has certain benefits. For one it ensures that each and every student is equal in terms of academic and co-curricular development by the time they reach college. This ensures a level playing field for all college bound students. Under status quo students from smaller towns and cities do not get the same level of education as do students from larger metros .A standardized national curriculum will hence eliminate this bias.
A nationalized curriculm will also help create the most optimized curriculm for students. A nationalized curriculum can be created by chossing the best subjects from across all the education boards. Hence the all round development of students will also be achieved. For example certain boards may have an academically intensive curriculum with no emphasis on sports or extra curricular activities. A nationalized curriculum will ensure that students across various boards will have the best possible development on all fronts.
A nationalized curriculum will also create a level playing field for admissions to various professional courses. Since all the students have studied the same subjects, with the same difficulty level they can be graded relative to each other with respect to their GPA's. Under status quo normalization of scores of students from various boards takes place to arrive at a scaled score.
However there are a few pitfalls associated with this proposed measure. For one, more advanced boards may not want to temper their curriculums. For example the international baccalaurate(IB) lays emphasis on rigorous curriculm.If the IB board had to reduce the workload of its curriclum to be on par with other non rigorous state boards, the value of attaing an IB diploma would serously diminish.
Another shortcoming of this measure is seen in countries like India which is a country of multiple languages and traditions. For example the education board in one state would want its students to study the local dialect. The education board in another state may want students to study thier local language. Hence maintaing a common ground would be indeed very difficult
Hence in conclusion both sides of the argument have their fair share of pros and cons. While a common syllabus will ensure parity on both academic and co-curricular fronts and ensure proper and fair comparison of students it may not be feasible due to the shortcomings mentioned. A country should therefore continue to let various boards maintain thier autonomy in preparing their curriculum but should set guidelines for boards with less intensive curriculum. This will ensure that they too strengthen their curriculum and ensure competence among all students of the nation
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of GoldenAge Independent and Assisted Living Facilities for Seniors."A novel therapy has come to our attention that promises to significantly decrease the incidence of dementia in our aging community. Accord 90
- A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow, specialized study of a single discipline. Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned. 76
- "A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college." 79
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did the 80
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed." 90
Comments
thanks for the score if you
thanks for the score
if you could provide me with a few tips how to increase my score to a 5 or 6 that would be indeed very helpful
There are no problems for
There are no problems for your language from the evaluates. Most likely you need to change a little bit of your writing style.
1. Try to write essays in five paragraphs
2. Submit more essays to see if you have other flaws.
3. Read more essays by top users
http://www.testbig.com/users/sauvikb
http://www.testbig.com/users/ronaldo
http://www.testbig.com/users/computergem
http://www.testbig.com/users/okoronkwoac
http://www.testbig.com/users/rats21
and more:
http://www.testbig.com/essay-categories/gmatgre
Let us know if you have more questions.
Sentence: A nationalized curriculum can be created by chossing the best subjects from across all the education boards.
Error: chossing Suggestion: choosing
Sentence: The education board in another state may want students to study thier local language.
Error: thier Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Hence maintaing a common ground would be indeed very difficult
Error: maintaing Suggestion: maintaining
Sentence: A country should therefore continue to let various boards maintain thier autonomy in preparing their curriculum but should set guidelines for boards with less intensive curriculum.
Error: thier Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
Number of Paragraphs: 7 5
You may focus on one side.
better to have 5 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction. my choice: A or B. agree or disagree
para 2: reason 1
para 3: reason 2
para 4: reason 3 (optional)
para 5: conclusion
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 499 350
No. of Characters: 2594 1500
No. of Different Words: 231 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.726 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.198 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.796 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 196 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 152 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 113 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 67 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.96 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.743 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.64 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.301 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.563 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 7 5