TPO42 independent- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history defining tasks for employees plays a prominent role in all civilized societies. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration in order to examine the constructive and destructive facets of the subject. Due to its paramount importance, huge steps have been taken to elevate its role. Some people may hold the view that it is better for workers to have a variety of tasks during the day. However, in the meantime, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and propose that workers should have similar tasks in their work. From my vantage point, I believe that the former viewpoint may generally carry more weight. In what follows, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
First of all, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that having different types of tasks will help workers to be energetic and productive. In fact, having some different tasks to do during the day, will not make people gloomy and bored. So, every time they feel that they need to change their work they can switch to another task and do their jobs parallel to each other
In approaching this issue, apart from what mentioned above, there is another subtle point which must be born in mind. Workers who have various tasks to do usually need to promote their skills and knowledge more than workers with monotask. Actually, in every job, people should increase their work skills and be seasoned in what they do. So, people who have many tasks should put an extra effort in every section of their job to reach the summit point of their work. In long time, they see themselves someone who has a vast knowledge of more subjects than one.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at first glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. The noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics revealed that people workers who have different tasks are more satisfied than employees with one task during the day. A new study has been conducted in a large company with two groups of people with equal work conditions expect the number of tasks they carried out. The results of this study indicated that workers with workers who have different tasks to do during the day feel better about their job and are more appealed.
In the final analysis, according to what was mentioned in the body paragraph above, no one could deny the fact that aforementioned subject is a controversial matter of subject which needs to be elaborately addressed to precisely examine its aspect. Nevertheless, there is authentic evidence which can lead us to this conclusion that employees should have tasks variety in order to be more productive, seasoned and self-satisfied.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- TPO50 -Integrated task 3
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only 3 days a week for long hoursthan to have a job where you work 5 days a week for shorter hours. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 90
- TPO integ18 97
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, apart from, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2283.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95227765727 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58417060383 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488069414317 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5413715999 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.15 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.05 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326128658362 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108182435638 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767708302097 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195025094242 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909205112398 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.