4-Day Workweek
The reading claims that converting 5-day workweek to 4-day workweek with 10 hour work time instead of 8 hour offers benefits to both businesses and employees. However, the lecturer finds all ideas dubious and present some evidence to refute them all.
The author argues that this conversion will lower expanses of employees. For example they have to drive to work only 4-day. And they can save the money they would have to pay for 1 more day to get to their work. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that although this argument seems to be true, the reduction on the expanses is not adequate. By working 4-day in a week saving for gas is like 850 dollars for each month which is not enough.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that operating costs of most businesses will be reduced as well. Also employees have more energy to work since they had 3 days off. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that by converting 5-day workweek to 4-day, businesses will lose 20 percent of their potential costumers. They are working 2 extra hour in each day but the fact is that they are working in the evening when the most of the customers are gone. So this save can not be justified.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that this conversion can bring 1 more day for employees to be with their family. They can spend time with their children and back to work happier. In contrast, the speaker dismissed this issue due to the fact that if employees have young children they have to find a place like kindergarden which works up to evening which is hard to fine according to the speaker. Also if employees have old enough children to go to the school, one more day is not helpful since they are in school at the time their parents are in home.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | masoumsaie | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | masoumsaie | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | imvok3r | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | mohammadkmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | mohammadkmi | 60 | view |
- TPO 42 task 1 75
- Some parents offers their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 70
- TPO 40 Q 1 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendship with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends? 70
- Do you agree or disagree?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...eek with 10 hour work time instead of 8 hour offers benefits to both businesses and ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ost businesses will be reduced as well. Also employees have more energy to work sinc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...ial costumers. They are working 2 extra hour in each day but the fact is that they a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... hard to fine according to the speaker. Also if employees have old enough children t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59561128527 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36543589979 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495297805643 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9264301194 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274209791181 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998748217115 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129475573086 0.0662205650399 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204031029991 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106422384185 0.0443174109184 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 53.8541721854 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.2367328918 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.