The pie charts illustrate the number of men and women took into custody while the bar chart gives recent causes why they were into custody in five years from 1989 to 1994.
Overall, the figure of men imprisoned was larger than women in the period given. For the recent causes, the public drinking accounted for the highest proportion of causes whereas the least percentage of causes was no answer.
Regarding the pie charts, above 30% men arrested which was greater four times than women about 9%. As a result, the figure of both genders no arrested accounted for 68% and 91% respectively.
The percentage of women related to public drinking, assault and no answer accounted for higher than men. The public drinking was the highest proportion around 37% women and slightly over 30% men, followed by assault nearly 20% and over 15% respectively and no answer was the lowest proportion arrange from 5% to 7%. In contrast, the proportions of men were higher than women in four left causes. The figure of drink driving of men was over 25% and under 15% women, arrange from over 10% to nearly 20% were the proportion of three causes, namely, breach of order, theft and other reason.
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 11
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 11
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 84
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developingand industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: NOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...As a result, the figure of both genders no arrested accounted for 68% and 91% resp...
^^
Line 7, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reach of order, theft and other reason.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, whereas, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82843137255 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33812224826 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3406358477 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147231191835 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665864239037 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700998108245 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115749137122 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745501028503 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.