Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations or reading.
I agree and disagree with the statement at the same time. My partial agreement is because I
bolster the reasoning of promoting and giving raises to the employees on the basis of merit and work performance. This not only encourages productivity but also encourages every individual to work harder and improve every day. It motivates the employees to push themselves beyond their limits and think outside the box in order to get the promotion or raise they have been waiting for since long. Consequently, this benefits the company, augments their reputation and profits, and hence, the employees are benefited.
My disagreement is based on the fact that as employees grow older, their ability to perform well, their productivity decreases, and hence if the sole criteria for promotion and giving raises are productivity and merit, the elder employees' chances for getting the promotion are hampered. Another reason for the decreased productivity of any employee, elder or younger,
can be a recent mishap in their personal lives, which makes it harder for them to focus on their job and give their best. This, as it can be seen, wouldn't encourage productivity and as a result,
deteriorates the company's reputation.
Therefore setting work performance and merit as the only criteria for promotion or giving raises can be good and bad at the same time. Hence, along with, better-suited criteria must be devised for promoting employees which benefits both younger and elder employees at the same time and doesn't hamper anyone's chances of being rewarded for their hard work.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-24 | Sruthi Bheemineni | 50 | view |
2019-08-24 | Shrija Sheth | 83 | view |
2019-06-19 | fresky | 40 | view |
2019-03-18 | Rakshick Shrinivas | 50 | view |
2019-01-07 | abyz123 | 58 | view |
- "The following was used as part of an internet advertising company's appeal to businesses: Furniture Depot employed our internet advertising company to help. Since then its sales increased by 10% over last year's totals. Furniture Depot's success demonstr 18
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity. Discuss the extent t 50
- Group #1: Analysis of Issue The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons an 50
- "The most effective strategy for a company to use to maintain and increase profits over the long term is to maintain high ethical standards."Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons a 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... time. My partial agreement is because I bolster the reasoning of promoting and g...
^^^
Line 4, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivity of any employee, elder or younger, can be a recent mishap in their personal...
^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ve their best. This, as it can be seen, wouldnt encourage productivity and as a result,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... encourage productivity and as a result, deteriorates the companys reputation. ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...eteriorates the companys reputation. Therefore setting work performance and merit as t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nd elder employees at the same time and doesnt hamper anyones chances of being rewarde...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 255.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19215686275 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78102539873 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3834112565 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.4 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292559832845 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120994228402 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686962853247 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125802375434 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964238160135 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.