Recently, the phenomenon of mass media and its corresponding impacts have sparkled the heated debate. Although contested by many that influence by mass media is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded through both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that it can shape the society, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the pivot of society standpoint, electronic media can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that behavior of children, as well as patterns, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of mass media on people of different ages. Thus, effects of both radio and television can be seen.
Within the realm of the types of contents that we have access to, the aggressive programs on might increase the risk of increasing violence in society. Moreover, fundamental aspects of our spirit related to this reality that the demerit of the aggressive movies pertains to aggression in our life. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of media influence is correlated negatively with criminal actions. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of media's effects.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe of influence of mass media on people.
- In education system, assessment through formal written examination still valid? 77
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 80
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30833333333 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0185077255 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8960377483 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.818181818 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173956350709 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593886061818 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399740350524 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105877930646 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379282207871 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.