The bar chart illustrates the users of car trips from men and women for a various purposes in 2005. The purposes are measured in percent.
Overall, the percentage of users of car trips from men was higher than of women. Both the men and the women used cars mostly in work purpose, while that men least using car was for bank and running errands, compare to women was for visiting town.
In term of work purpose, men used car trips above 50% as opposed to almost 40% for women. The users for visiting town from men was higher than those users from women ( almost 10% and less than 10%). Expandly variance usage from men for cars in recreation purpose over 10% compare to women almost used it for that purpose.
In contrast, women used cars for shopping almost 20% compare to men exactly 10%. The users from women exceeded 10% for courses purpose as opposed to men not reach 10%( Less than 10% ). Bank and running errands women were higher users ( almost 10% and exactly 10% ) although men was almost a users for this purpose.
- The dangers and complexities of the modern world have made the mobile phone an absolutenecessity for children.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge andexperience. Wri 38
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education inBritain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 56
- he bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005Write a report. 67
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education inBritain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 56
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Purposes
...d women for a various purposes in 2005. purposes are measured in percent. Overall, th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% for women. The users for visiting town from men was higher than those users fro...
^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n was higher than those users from women almost 10% and less than 10% . In con...
^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...from women almost 10% and less than 10% . In contrast, women used cars for sho...
^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... purpose as opposed to men not reach 10% Less than 10% .
^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...osed to men not reach 10% Less than 10% .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 632.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48226950355 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.97750071336 2.65546596893 74% => OK
Unique words: 66.0 106.607317073 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468085106383 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.391132578 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114671255605 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768618582597 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882921326339 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995267301872 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760772206375 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.