The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996
A glance at the graph reveals the difference between expenditure patterns between the year 1966 and 1996.
Overall, charts are accounted for the increase and decrease during these years. It is evident that the proportion of food dramatically decreased, followed by petrol, furniture, as well as books. However, it is obvious that the percentage of money that spent on cars are considerably rose up in the year 1996 along with restaurants and computers.
On the one hand, in 1966 food made up 44% of all expenses, while computers was the smallest portion. In contrast, in 1996 the per cent of food significantly reduced to 14% and the portion of computers rose up to 10%.
On the other hand, the portion of restaurants had doubled and reached to 14% in 1996, while per cent of petrol and furniture went through a marginal change from 9% and 10%, to an equal proportion. The expense from books reduced by 5% in the late year.
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003. 56
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 3
- Competitiveness is a skill that is required in order to succeed. How does competitiveness affect the individual? Is it positive or negative? 67
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 84
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in Canada.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...ney that spent on cars are considerably rose up in the year 1996 along with restaura...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, while, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75776397516 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72146101638 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5013502861 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160061436725 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665124934978 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885347554459 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11228078677 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105709479688 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.