The graph below shows the percentage of household grouped by poverty on basis of access to refrigerator,electricity, and water in Ghana for the year 1991-1992 to 1998-1999.
The given bar chart depicts, poor household consumption presented three categories (refrigerator,electricity and water) in gahan between 1991- 1992 years.
According the graph, lots of non poor people's were used electricity between 1998-1999years. And the lowest very poor peoples were used refrigerator from 1991-1992 and 1998-1999. These years were shown same percentage in different years. Non poor household people's were used consumption different years dramatically gone up and down. Very poor people's were represented gradually rised and down. But poor household consumption was presented year by year increased. Very poor people's were consumption refrigerator from 1991-1992 and 1998-1999 shown same percentage and in 1998-1999 year slightly dropped. But from 1991-1992 and 1998-1999 years were roughlychclimbed. And refrigerator,electricity and water categories were consumption shown approximately same percentage between years. In conclusion, lots of peoples were used electricity and the lowest people's were used refrigerator.
- The chart below shows information about the challenges people face when they go to live in othe countries. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spared from 1981- 2007 73
- Scientist predict that all people will chose to talk the same global language in the future. Do you think positive or negative development? 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six ares of the world 49
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spread from 191. - 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , electricity
... presented three categories refrigerator,electricity and water in gahan between 1991- 1992 y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , electricity
... were roughlychclimbed. And refrigerator,electricity and water categories were consumption s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.26573426573 4.92477711251 127% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.76579757237 2.65546596893 142% => OK
Unique words: 61.0 106.607317073 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426573426573 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3807790476 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4545454545 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224393010789 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120405914304 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785401529775 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183040818891 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250708134311 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.2 11.4140731707 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.