The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
The letter makes an assumption that retention equals quality. Even though Oceania University's faculty retention increased, there are lack of evidences regarding the quality and morale of the retained professors.
First, the study needs to show that the quality of teaching has increased among professors with college-aged children. The study could cite that these professors are more actively engaged than professors without children as evidence for the increasing quality. If this was true, then it would strengthen the claim and free tuition policy could be beneficial for Seatown. However, if Seatown already offers the highest quality of education, then instituting this policy will have nugatory effects.
Also, increasing retention does not necessarily translated to enhancing morale among the faculty because the free tuition only benefits the faculty with children. It does not benefit young faculty who have not yet established a family. If Seatown has a higher percentage of faculty without children, then the policy would have little effect on the general morale. On the other hand, if the majority of Seatown's faculty has college-aged children, then adopting this policy would be beneficial.
Moreover, the study needs to analyze the retention rate across time. If the retention rate decreases sharply after the college children graduate, then adopting this policy would only have short-term benefits. However, if the retention rate is higher consistently over time at Oceania, then this evidence would support the argument.
Lastly, the committee claims that the policy would help lure new professors. But, they need to provide evidence that the policy would lure high quality professors rather than low quality professors. A increase in number of application of unqualified professors would only cause administrative headache for Seatown.
Consequently, the President needs more evidence from the study that equates retention to quality before he or she decides to institute this policy.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-09-17 | rockingboy | 70 | view |
2013-07-15 | zen123 | 65 | view |
2013-02-04 | mightyblue123 | 92 | view |
2012-10-25 | rahmar | 45 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 92
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 68
- "Regulators and policymakers should respond to potential environmental threats even before the information is fully known or concrete."How would you rate the accuracy of the above statement? Support your position with reasons and examples. 90
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals. Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 53
- "The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large. "Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your o 80
Sentence: However, if Seatown already offers the highest quality of education, then instituting this policy will have nugatory effects.
Error: nugatory Suggestion: negator
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 153 200
Sentence Length SD: 4.076 7.5
Read this link about sentence length SD:
http://www.testbig.com/question/questions-about-essay-e-rater
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 303 350
No. of Characters: 1663 1500
No. of Different Words: 153 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.172 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.488 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.656 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 136 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.824 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.076 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.765 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.367 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.653 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.148 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5