Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why?
Human beings have always been eager to have the best moments in their lives. It gives them pleasure in different circumstances. Having food is one of the most important issues that can bring them such feelings. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this point is that how they can experience memorable times when they want to eat food. Some people believe that going to restaurants is a good choice for this purpose. Others, including me, have a different viewpoint. I strongly believe that it is better to buy and eat meals at home. Not only does it create excellent opportunities to have kind relationships with family members, but also healthier foods are available at home. In what follows, I am going to scrutinize the most outstanding reasons.
First and foremost, valuable moments can be made when we eat besides our family at home. It paves the way for having strong communications with each other. In fact, it causes that people be aware of each other. They can talk about various issues that can enhance the family relationships between the family members. For instance, when I was a teenager, my parent has always participated in meetings for having dinner. I used to talk about my educational challenges when we were eating food. Since, they have hectic days, this time was a golden time to hear me. As a result, they gave me much invaluable advice. As you can see, this time had a profound effect on my personality to be a close friend with my family members.
A furthermore significant point is that it is possible to prepare healthier food at home. You can add some useful materials to your food when you eat at home, however, the main meal may have prepared from the external sources. It leads people to have a proper diet in their lifestyle. Based on my own personal experience, when I was a mechanical engineering student, I used to eat food at the university. The given food had not any nutrition ingredients. For instance, sometimes it was fatty and sometimes it had a lot of salt. Once I decided to transfer my food to my home, my mother processed it well. After a while, it has remarkable effects on my health conditions. Had I eaten meals at the university, I would not have reached to the proper weight.
By taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, it seems that being with family members at home for having food is a rational perspective. For sake of the brevity, strengthen the family relationships and having healthier conditions are the most outstanding reasons for this assertion. Hence, having food at the home environment is highly recommended for everyone who wishes to have pleasure time during the lifetime.
- TPO 48 81
- getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting that from your peers. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 70
- Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay; an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun? 70
- Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.Agree/Disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 755, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not have reached to the proper weight. By taking into account all the aforement...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, well, while, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83260869565 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81571592027 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513043478261 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5134715461 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.43333333333 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186380588727 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560329188222 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609367531466 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125903077337 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438819744707 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.