The reading and the lecture are about Chevalier Seingalt, who wrote about famous people of the eighteen century. The author of the article says that his writings do not seem to be credible. The lecturer casts doubts on the claims from the passage. He says that the arguments of the passage can be easily contradicted by historical proves.
First, by borrowing money does not necessary mean that Chevalier was poor. This is because he had assets that needed to be exchange to cash, process that lasts a few days. Therefore, it is not an unusual habit to borrow some cash for a short period of time. Not to mention that he used to have a luxurious live, full with parties and gambling habits. This is a strong counterpoint to the author's assumptions.
Second, there are some ways to keep accurate the conversations between him and Voltaire. The author contends that this idea can not be realistic, since he wrote his memories years after he had small talks with Voltaire. However, the speaker underlines that Chevalier transposed his dialogues with Voltaire, every night after. This fact is also confirmed by his entourage, pointing that he was indeed consulting the notes when he wrote his memories. This is another standpoint that contradicts the passage.
Third, the theory stating he bribed watchmen to help him breakout the prison is inaccurate, because the jail was full with rich individuals. If this method had been successful, there is no doubt that many would have tried to do the same. But, this thing did not happened. Moreover, the ceiling of the cell he occupied, was repaired after a short while he escaped. This fact is also in contradiction with the passage, because it shows a concrete prove of his escape. In conclusion, the author and the lecturer appear to be in disagreement regarding this topic.
- What are some of the qualities of good parent? Use specific details and examples to explain your answer. 90
- What is the most important animal in your country? Why is the animal important? Use reasons and specific details to explain your answers 70
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 84
- Imagine you are preparing for a trip. You plan to be away from your home for a year. In addition to clothing and personal care items, you can take one additional thing. What would you take and why? 70
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is writings do not seem to be credible. The lecturer casts doubts on the claims fro...
^^^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proofs' (noun) instead of proves (verb)?
Suggestion: proofs
...an be easily contradicted by historical proves. First, by borrowing money does not ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...l habit to borrow some cash for a short period of time. Not to mention that he used to have a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
...to do the same. But, this thing did not happened. Moreover, the ceiling of the cell he o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90938511327 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6505308783 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566343042071 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5951167217 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.85 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.45 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267003104435 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762075344842 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547878777014 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166551920619 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260693046163 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.