With the development of the society, people start to consider how to create a more joyful society. Some of them hold on an idea that narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor can be the best way to improve the life standard. However, I disagree with this point to some extent. I will give supporting arguments to this view and provide other ideas to create a more joyful society.
Initially, there is a variety of means making a happier society. For instance, if the government ensured the rights of citizens, such as a fair chance of education, employment and health sevices, people would feel satisfied with the society. Taking the Asia for example, it has a large population so that it's a bit difficult for the governments to preserve human rigrhts. Some people who are middle class even lower, they need to obey the rule standing in a line to wait for called in hospital, whereas, some rich people who are up class have the privilege. Even in terms of education, some poor family cannot enjoy the education rights so the children can't receive good education, which is not helpful to enhance the whole sense of happiness.
Movermore, narrowing the gap between the richest and the poorest may can result in social decay to some extent. Money is a gteat motivator for most people because they can improve the life standards and gain a sense of accomplishment. However, the rich may not have the incentive to work harder and entrepreneurs are also not willing to set up a business,which is not condusive to social development. As a result, people may be unhappy with social decay.
On the other hand, there is no deny that it is useful to way to develop a happier socety. Paying tax can have important implications to a society. We should recogise that the government can achieve the goal of imcome redistribution by taxation. For example, in many countries the high income group needs to pay more high tax, while the low income group can get assistance from the government, which not only can balance the gap in income, but also enhance people's happiness.
Overall, I am convinced that bridge the gap is a great way to improve life standards, but is not the only excellent approach,there are various means making a happier society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...mple, it has a large population so that its a bit difficult for the governments to ...
^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...oy the education rights so the children cant receive good education, which is not he...
^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...re also not willing to set up a business,which is not condusive to social development....
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
..., but is not the only excellent approach,there are various means making a happier soci...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77179487179 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70551704582 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2588745704 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.388888889 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117142995487 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373876313756 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306224725407 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636414868215 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128266101213 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.