Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building?
Use specific reasons and details to support your choice.
Some people prefer to live in traditional large houses while others love modern apartments as well as its convenience. Were I given a choice, I would live in a delicate apartment.
Normally, apartment buildings locate near or in a city which has abundant modern facilities such as libraries, movie theaters, post offices, banks, drug stores, and so on. Without these public facilities or all types of stores, life can be way more inconvenience. For instance, it will take you much time to just make a complement for what you’ve forgotten to buy in a supermarket if you live in a traditional house which typically locates in countryside. Instead, living in apartment buildings enables you to solve daily life troubles. Imagine how convenient it will be to send a mail in emergency, go to a clinic when you get a cold or relax yourself in movie theaters at night without bothering long distance.
Furthermore, it’s safer to dwell in modern apartments. Not only the complete public system of lights and monitors on roads, but also the security guards stay for 24 hours right down the building make sure people’ safety. Especially for women and girls who go home late at night, all of these secure settings prevent females form dangers. It’s less likely to happen for traditional houses residents that someone or some facilities will stay all along the way you go home so as to keep you safe.
Most important of all, modern apartment benefits people with its public transport surrounds them. For me, the MRT, U-Bike and the traffic apps save me bunch of time so that I can have more time for leisure activities. Though it’s warmer and more comfortable to live in traditional house with supportive neighbors, but these advantages mentioned above don’t come with it. Thus, I prefer to live in a modern apartment building.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-25 | Murphy | 76 | view |
| 2015-05-19 | watermelon | 60 | view |
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 68
- TPO 36 3
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 85
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...will stay all along the way you go home so as to keep you safe. Most important of al...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01618122977 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81616256049 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608414239482 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.102590913 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27759288156 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102097282946 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852349484124 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185632144256 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776641282999 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.