The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990.
Describe the information.
The graphs illustrates the contribution of people in education and science, in under-developed and developed countries, in 1980 and 1990. There are three illustrations describing the factors.
The first graph mentions the years of education received at the school. In 1980, over 2 years of schooling were taken by the students in undeveloped countries, however it rose up to 3 years in 1990. Whereas, more than 8 years were spent on education in 80's and in a decade it increased for over 10 years.
The second diagram the number of scientists and technicians. In backward countries, from 1980 to 1990, there wasn't a noticeable change recorded. However, in industrialized countries the digits grew from 45 to 70, in a 1000 peoples were well qualified scientists and technicians.
Lastly, the chart tells about the amount spent on researching and development centers. The amount decreased in primitive nations from $50 billions to about $25 billions, but in advanced nations it went up to $350 billions in span of a decade.
Overall, the height of involvement in education and science is more in progressed countries than in developing countries. Furthermore, the developed countries are way ahead than the primitive countries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The graphs illustrates the contribution of people in education...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ard countries, from 1980 to 1990, there wasnt a noticeable change recorded. However, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, second, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36040609137 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16666655365 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56345177665 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0594188613 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257480960091 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899713882663 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674505428198 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134599232828 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729254535429 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.