Do you agree or disagree: “In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct”?
While traditionally, people praise perfect work even though it is time-consuming, modern society does not pursue perfection that much. Instead, people appreciate the fast-moving pace, and don’t resist to make mistakes. From my observation of life, I agree with the statement that in modern society it is more important to work quickly, even though it may cause some mistakes.
To begin with, modern society works in a very fast pace, and people must catch up with it otherwise they would fall behind others. For example, my colleagues discuss things and come up with new ideas very quickly in meetings, and sometimes they make mistakes in their discussion. However, we never stuck on those mistakes because we think those mistakes are minor and can be fixed later. Also, if we focus on correcting the errors, the meetings will be delayed and we have to find more time to meet, which is really inefficient. That is, working fast and efficiently is more important to modern people so risking minor mistakes are acceptable.
In the second place, modern technology can fix problems quickly, so even though mistakes happen, they are no longer problems. To illustrate, I work in a fast pace and reply emails to my customers very quickly to meet their expectation. As a result, I make wrong spelling occasionally. However, it is ok because my computer will correct my spelling immediately. In contrast, if I spend time checking every word carefully, even though I can write a perfect email, my client would be unhappy because I respond to them not quickly enough.
Nevertheless, some people still hold that they don’t want to make any mistakes. Yet, they must understand that in fact, people welcome mistakes more today, because mistakes allow people to discover the drawback of current system and further to make improvement. For instance, the Apple Company updates their software system very often, and there are always mistakes in the most updated version. However, they do not worry about it because after they release the new version, they would get hundreds of feedbacks from their users, which actually help them to find the mistakes that they could not otherwise. Hence, risking making mistakes is not problematic.
In summary, we live in a society which advances in a fast pace. To keep up with it, people work quickly, dare to make mistakes, and also respond to make improvement accordingly. That is why I contend that it is more important to work quickly, even though it may cause some mistakes.
- Which of the following would you choose? A job with regular salary and regular working hours OR a job with high salary but long working hours? 70
- People are easier to get educated today than in the past. 70
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 73
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 78
- As the leader of a city what would you do to ensure the prosperity and success of the city A creating job opportunities for the unemployed B lowering food price C providing affordable housing 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 551, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...dbacks from their users, which actually help them to find the mistakes that they could not otherw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, in fact, in summary, as a result, to begin with, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03827751196 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68790950174 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492822966507 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4077670806 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236322190514 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795704126979 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567013660751 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138229125575 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302670422583 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.