Essay topics: TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task
Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the environment and suggest that the United States government should create new, much stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash.
However, representatives of power companies take the opposite view; they argue that new regulations are unnecessary and might actually have negative consequences They use the following arguments to support their position.
Regulations Exist
First, power company representatives point out that effective environmental regulations already exist. For example, one very important regulation requires companies to use liner-special material that prevents coal ash components from leaking into the soil and contaminating the surrounding environment. Companies that dispose of coal ash in disposal ponds or landfills must use liner in every new pond or landfill they build.
Concerns About Recycling Coal Ash
Second, some analysts predict that creating very strict rules for storing and handling coal ash might discourage the recycling of coal ash into other products Currently, a large portion of coal ash generated by power plants is recycled: it is used, for example, in building materials such as concrete and bricks Recycling coal ash reduces the need to dispose of it in other ways and presents no environmental danger. However, if new, stricter rules are adopted for handling coal ash, consumers may become concerned that recycled coal ash products are just too dangerous, and may stop buying the products
Increased Cost
Finally, strict new regulations would result in a significant increase in disposal and handling costs for the power companies. perhaps as much as ten times the current costs. Power companies would be forced to increase the price of electricity, which would not be welcomed by the general public.
The reading passage claims that the burning coal in power planets produces a abundant polluted material named coal ash and environmental activist suggests to U.S government to create new stringent rules for this factories. But according to the reading argument the representatives of the factories have an absolutely opposite view. This view summarizes three specific reasons in the passage. While, the lecturer casts doubt on these reasons and says that they are obviously erroneous.
First, the reading claims that the regulation which are existed now are not efficient and the new rules will make more complaint between the government and companies. for example rule about the using the liner-special material which is not effective at all for controlling the farms to leaks their coal ask components to the soil. But, on the other hand the lecturer states that the present rules are just for the new ponds and lands and it is not for the old ones. So, this point made the old one t leak their cantaminented materials to the water underground which they are the causes of the polluting of the drink water .
Second, the lecture says that the concerning of the consumer for usning the recycled material is not any crucial probllem for creating new rules. Because, for example the mekuri as a harmful material whcich was restricted for 50 years have not any problem with it's consumers. So, it can be said that this is not for the consumer tantalizing.
Finally, the lecture claims that the increasing of producing of the power will be increased but as a precise calculating by the scientist this cost is about 15 billion dollars which if it be cost per consumer, it will just increase the cost of power of the consumer for one percent which it is minuscular it the budget of the people. So, this idea is wrong and has a loot of biases either.
conclusively, it can be said that the consequences of this policy for restricting of the plants of the power production must be encourage is incredibly important and productive, Specially from the long run view of point which always it must consider the consequences of any policy on the environment under some circumstances.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Essay topics: TPO-45 - Integrated Writing TaskAny student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Ju 73
- Essay topics: TPO-43 - Integrated Writing TaskAgnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids 73
- A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some paleontologists interpret the li 70
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... burning coal in power planets produces a abundant polluted material named coal a...
^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...nd environmental activist suggests to U.S government to create new stringent rule...
^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nment to create new stringent rules for this factories. But according to the reading...
^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...t between the government and companies. for example rule about the using the liner-...
^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...uses of the polluting of the drink water . Second, the lecture says that the co...
^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...talizing. Finally, the lecture claims that the increasing of producing of the ...
^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... cost is about 15 billion dollars which if it be cost per consumer, it will just ...
^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...is about 15 billion dollars which if it be cost per consumer, it will just increa...
^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars which if it be cost per consumer, it will just increase the cost of power of ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conclusively
...ong and has a loot of biases either. conclusively, it can be said that the consequences o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, so, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 369.0 270.72406181 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91327913279 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77508612387 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509485094851 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.7993129063 49.2860985944 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351154178097 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107091262045 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866577357684 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17829418363 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492586864866 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.