1. Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author of argument purportedly asserts that the woven baskets are not just made by palean people and such an artifact were discovered in other place. However, the premises upon which he puts his claim are fallacious. For the support of which more well-established evidence should be given.
First, the author contends that these baskets have been discovered only in adjacent of palea village and were made by palean people. However, it does not lend credence to the argument since there is no sufficient evidence to support if palean village were only place that this artifact has been discovered. One point that should be considered is that maybe people who made these baskets were from different nations and emigrated to the palea village many years ago and settled in this place. Indeed, there is no evidence to show that whether these people were originally born in palea village or not. It is also important to say that in ancient time many people were used to trade with other places and there is possibility that these baskets originated with other people.
The author also attributes that archeologist have been found same baskets in Litos near the palean village across the Brim River. Although it might seem tenable at face, it has some detects, due to the paucity of evidence that would consolidate the premise the otherwise. One of the main, if not the only, problem with the premise is that Litos was in vicinity of palean village and there is possibility that palean people were in rush, moving in and moving out and in this way, maybe Woven baskets were carried to the Litos village. Alongside that, perhaps people used from these baskets for their daily works near the rivers such as fishing and there is possibility that Woven basket had dropped into the river and remain for many years until discovery of archeologist.
Finally, as set forth by the author the River is deep and broad and palean people could have passed it only with boat. In addition, no boat were discovered in this River. Nevertheless, the rationale behind the premise could be challenged owing to an inadequate evidence to support if people were used only boat in order to crossed the river. One point that should not go unnoticed is that evidences has shown that ancient people were proficient in construction such as building or bridge and so forth. There is possibility that palean people have built bridge on the Brim River in order to cross the river easier. Moreover, maybe boats shipwrecked into the river and decomposed entirely in passage of time due to the fact that River is deep and broad.
Having scrutinized the premises, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there is some evidence, having been ignored by the author while the presence of which could add to the logic of each premises.
- People should only read those books that are about real events, real people and established facts. Do you agree or disagree? 76
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 58
- A person should never make an important decision alone. Do you agree or disagree? 71
- Never never give up, means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Neighbor are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the good quality of a good neighbor? 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: ORIGINALLY_BORN_IN[1]
Message: Use simply 'born in'.
Suggestion: born in
... to show that whether these people were originally born in palea village or not. It is also import...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould add to the logic of each premises.
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230620155039 0.25644967241 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.187984496124 0.15541462614 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0794573643411 0.0836205057962 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0562015503876 0.0520304965353 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.015503875969 0.0272364105082 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145348837209 0.125424944231 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0678294573643 0.0416121511921 163% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43155971321 2.79052419416 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0271317829457 0.026700313972 102% => OK
Particles: 0.00193798449612 0.001811407834 107% => OK
Determiners: 0.100775193798 0.113004496875 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0174418604651 0.0255425247493 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015503875969 0.0127820249294 121% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2817.0 2731.13054187 103% => OK
No of words: 480.0 446.07635468 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86875 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.57801047555 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31875 0.378187486979 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.21875 0.287650121315 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.135416666667 0.208842608468 65% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0875 0.135150697306 65% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43155971321 2.79052419416 87% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 207.018472906 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429166666667 0.469332199767 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.0795866091 52.1807786196 92% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.2631578947 23.2022227129 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6352718113 57.7814097925 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.263157895 141.986410481 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2631578947 23.2022227129 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.736842105263 0.724660767414 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.58251231527 56% => OK
Readability: 47.1381578947 51.9672348444 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.70895522388 1.8405768891 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442769798768 0.441005458295 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.138052002533 0.135418324435 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0529146817043 0.0829849096947 64% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.600371069497 0.58762219726 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13700361951 0.147661913831 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201822225722 0.193483328276 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109039828169 0.0970749176394 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.426528834861 0.42659136922 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.131133123628 0.0774707102158 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312923575733 0.312017818177 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051939869857 0.0698173142475 74% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.33743842365 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.87684729064 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.82512315271 187% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 9.0 2.82389162562 319% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 14.657635468 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.