According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated. Groveton's honor code replaced a system in which teachers closely monitored students; under that system, teachers reported an average of thirty cases of cheating per year. In the first year the honor code was in place, students reported twenty-one cases of cheating; five years later, this figure had dropped to fourteen. Moreover, in a recent survey, a majority of Groveton students said that they would be less likely to cheat with an honor code in place than without. Thus, all colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton's in order to decrease cheating among students.
The argument about recent report that all colleges and university should adopt honor code like Groveton’s in order to decrease cheating among students. According to reports, cheating among college and university students is on rise. However, Argument fails to prove some points which is necessary to prove whether Groveton’s should be adopted or not.
As per recent report, Groveton College has successfully reduced cheating by adopting honor code. But who took the report and how many colleges and universities are in this report. What are the criteria of report? If report taken by one of the influencer of Groveton College then may be report are biased. And There honor code which calls students to agree not to cheat I their academic endeavours and notify a faculty member if they suspect other student who cheated. But even if they agree not to cheat in their academic endeavour but most of the time student does not follow rules and sometimes they cheat. And if they notify teachers about how other who cheated then how many cases is there. What steps are taken by faculty so students will not cheat?
Groveton’s honor code replaced a system in which teacher’s closely monitored students under system. There are thirty cases of students who cheated and which reduced to twenty one. What are the other college or university’s reports which follow same honor code? Is there a reduction in cheating cases there also? Report says later in five years, cases of cheating reduced to fourteen. If Groveton’s honor code is effective then why there is only seven cases less than cases five years ago.
Moreover, recent survey also says that students of Groveton’s college would be less likely to cheat with an honor code than without. But there are cases which say that number of students who cheated is not reduced.
In conclusion, cheating rises among college and university students but Groveton’s college has successfully reduced cheating cases by adopting an honor code may be required more details about report. If any college other than Groveton adopted honor code then what is the result of that college if they successfully reduced cheating cases or not. Author also fails to provide accurate details about what are the steps taken to reduced cases as there are not significant reduction in cases.
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents. 50
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 60
- "The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds." 50
- People do many different things to stay healthy. What do you do for good health? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
the arguments are not on the right track. Here goes a sample argument:
https://www.testbig.com/comment/52810#comment-52810
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 383 350
No. of Characters: 1888 1500
No. of Different Words: 153 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.424 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.93 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.358 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.409 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.206 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.361 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.535 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.118 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eport. What are the criteria of report? If report taken by one of the influencer o...
^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-one
...udents who cheated and which reduced to twenty one. What are the other college or universi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of students who cheated is not reduced. In conclusion, cheating rises among coll...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 383.0 441.139720559 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13315926893 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70412650822 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415143603133 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 705.55239521 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6183863021 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3636363636 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4090909091 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.70786347227 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.61042217214 0.218282227539 280% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224696628151 0.0743258471296 302% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146757708458 0.0701772020484 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.402227701379 0.128457276422 313% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631336184863 0.0628817314937 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 98.500998004 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.